- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-413/17: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 25 October 2018 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Lietuvos Aukščiausiasis Teismas — Lithuania) — proceedings brought by ‘Roche Lietuva’ UAB (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Public supply contract for medical diagnostic equipment and materials – Directive 2014/24/EU – Article 42 – Award – Margin of appreciation of the contracting authority – Detailed formulation of the technical specifications)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62017CA0413
62017CA0413
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C 4/5
(Case C-413/17) (*)
(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Public supply contract for medical diagnostic equipment and materials - Directive 2014/24/EU - Article 42 - Award - Margin of appreciation of the contracting authority - Detailed formulation of the technical specifications)
(2019/C 4/06)
Language of the case: Lithuanian
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
In the presence of: Kauno Dainavos poliklinika VšĮ
Operative part of the judgment
Articles 18 and 42 of Directive 2014/24/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 February 2014 on public procurement and repealing Directive 2004/18/EC must be interpreted as not imposing on the contracting authority, in establishing technical specifications in a procurement procedure concerning the acquisition of medical supplies, by principle, prioritising either the importance of the individual characteristics of the medical supplies or the importance of the result of their functioning, but requiring that the technical specifications, as a whole, comply with the principles of equality of treatment and proportionality. It is for the national court to assess whether, in the dispute before it, the technical specifications at issue comply with those requirements.
(*) Language of the case: Lithuanian.
* * *
(1) OJ C 309, 18.9.2017.