I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Appeal – Community trade mark – Regulation (EC) No 40/94 –Article 8(1)(b) – Mixed word and figurative trade mark, Celia – Relative grounds for refusal of registration – Similarity of the mark for which registration is sought to an earlier mark – Trade mark covering identical goods – Likelihood of confusion – Appeal manifestly inadmissible
Appeals – Grounds – Incorrect assessment of the facts – Inadmissibility – Review by the Court of Justice of the assessment of the facts and evidence – Possible only where the clear sense of the evidence has been distorted (Art. 225(1) EC; Statute of the Court of Justice, Art. 58, first para.) (see para. 35)
Appeal against judgment of the Court of First Instance (Third Chamber) of 23 April 2008 in Case T‑35/07 Leche Celta v OHIM, by which that court rejected the action brought by the applicant against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 5 December 2006 relating to opposition proceedings between Leche Celta SL and Celia SA – Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 40/94 on the Community trade mark (OJ 1994 L 11, p. 1) – Relative grounds for refusal of registration – Likelihood of confusion linked to application for registration of a mark similar to an earlier mark covering identical goods – Comparison of signs visually, phonetically and conceptually.
1.The appeal is dismissed.
2.Leche Celta SL is ordered to pay the costs.