EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case T-23/17: Judgment of the General Court of 16 May 2018 — Barnett v EESC (Civil service — Officials — Retirement pension — Early retirement without reduction of pension rights — Facility formerly provided for in Article 9(2) of Annex VIII to the Staff Regulations — Interests of the service — Compliance with an annulling judgment delivered by the Civil Service Tribunal — Liability)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62017TA0023

62017TA0023

May 16, 2018
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

(Case T-23/17) (1)

‛(Civil service — Officials — Retirement pension — Early retirement without reduction of pension rights — Facility formerly provided for in Article 9(2) of Annex VIII to the Staff Regulations — Interests of the service — Compliance with an annulling judgment delivered by the Civil Service Tribunal — Liability)’

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Inge Barnett (Roskilde, Denmark) (represented by: S. Orlandi and T. Martin, lawyers)

Defendant: European Economic and Social Committee (represented by: M. Pascua Mateo, K. Gambino, X. Chamodraka, A. Carvajal and L. Camarena Januzec, acting as Agents, and by M. Troncoso Ferrer and F.-M. Hislaire, lawyers)

Re:

Application under Article 270 TFEU seeking, primarily, the annulment of the decision of the EESC of 21 March 2016, taken with a view to complying with the judgment of 22 September 2015, Barnett v EESC (F-20/14, EU:F:2015:107), refusing to grant the applicant early retirement without reduction of pension rights and, secondarily, compensation for the damage which she claims to have suffered.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

1.Dismisses the action;

2.Orders Ms Inge Barnett to pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 104, 3.4.2017.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia