I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
EN
—
(2016/C 232/39)
Language in which the application was lodged: English
Applicant: Apax Partners UK Ltd (London, United Kingdom) (represented by: D. Rose and J. Warner, Solicitors)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Apax Partners Midmarket (Paris, France)
Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Applicant
Trade mark at issue: EU word mark ‘APAX PARTNERS’ – EU trade mark No 1 805 282
Procedure before EUIPO: Proceedings for a declaration of invalidity
Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 17 February 2016 in Case R 1611/2014-2
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision in its entirety and order the registration to be reinstated in its entirety by the EUIPO;
—order the EUIPO and any party involved in these proceedings before the Board to pay the costs of these proceedings and those of the Appeal before the Board and the Cancellation n. 779 C before the Cancellation Division.
—Infringement of Articles 8(1)(a), 8(1)(b) in conjunction with Article 53(1)(a) of Regulation No 207/2009.
—