EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case T-277/15: Action brought on 13 May 2015 — Permapore v OHIM — José Joaquim Oliveira II - Jardins & Afins (Terraway)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62015TN0277

62015TN0277

May 13, 2015
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 245/42

(Case T-277/15)

(2015/C 245/51)

Language in which the application was lodged: Portuguese

Parties

Applicant: Permapore Ltd (Nenagh, Tipperary, Ireland) (represented by: J. Sales, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: José Joaquim Oliveira II — Jardins & Afins Lda (Grijó, Portugal)

Details of the proceedings before OHIM

Applicant: Applicant

Trade mark at issue: Community figurative mark including the word element ‘Terraway’ — Application for registration No 11 988 301

Procedure before OHIM: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 5 March 2015 in Case R 2496/2014-1

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

Set aside the decision of the Board of Appeal of OHIM and substitute it with one which makes a ruling or which orders that a ruling be made — at length — on the substantive/material issues, and not just the issue of whether the court fee was paid in good time;

Pleas in law

The applicant claims that he paid the fee for appeal, provided for in Article 60 of Regulation No 207/2009, on 20 November 2014;

In terms of the substance of the case, the applicant alleges infringement of Article 52(1)(a) and (b), Article 7(1)(g) and the last part of Article 54(2) of Regulation No 207/2009.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia