- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-136/16: Action brought on 29 March 2016 — Caisse régionale de crédit agricole mutuel Brie Picardie v ECB
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62016TN0136
62016TN0136
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
17.5.2016
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 175/32
(Case T-136/16)
(2016/C 175/38)
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicant: Caisse régionale de crédit agricole mutuel Brie Picardie (Amiens, France) (represented by: H. Savoie, lawyer)
Defendant: European Central Bank
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the General Court should:
—annul the European Central Bank decision of 29 January 2016 (ECB/SSM/2016 — 969500TJ5KRTCJQWXH05/99) adopted under Article 4(1)(e) of Regulation (EU) No 468/2014 of the European Central Bank and under Articles L. 511-13, L. 511-52, L. 511-58, L. 612-23-1 and R. 612-29-3 of the French monetary and financial code (code monétaire et financier français).
Pleas in law and main arguments
In support of the action, the applicant relies on four pleas in law which are essentially identical or similar to those relied on in Case T-133/16, Caisse régionale de crédit agricole mutuel Alpes Provence v ECB.