- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-696/13: Action brought on 30 December 2013 — Meta Group v European Commission
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62013TN0696
62013TN0696
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
22.2.2014
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 52/44
(Case T-696/13)
2014/C 52/84
Language of the case: Italian
Parties
Applicant: Meta Group Srl (Rome, Italy) (represented by: A. Bartolini, V. Colcelli and A. Formica, lawyers)
Defendant: European Commission
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—Declare that the reductions made by the European Commission on the subsidies granted to META S.r.l are unlawful;
—And, consequently, order the Commission to pay the applicant the additional amount of EUR 129 153,11, together with default interest;
—Order the administration to compensate the applicant for the consequential loss suffered by it.
Pleas in law and main arguments
This action is brought against the decisions of the Commission which reduced the grant initially provided for the projects ‘Bcreative’, ‘Take-It-Up’ and ‘Ecolink +’, which grant agreements were concluded between the applicant and the defendant in the context of the ‘Competitiveness and Innovation Framework Programme (CIP) (2007 — 2013)’.
Several decisions concerning those projects were also contested in Cases T — 471/12, T — 34/13 and T — 35/13, Meta Group v Commission.
The pleas in law and main arguments set out are identical to those raised in those cases.