- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-680/19 P: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 18 November 2021 — Fulmen v Council of the European Union, European Commission (Appeal — Common foreign and security policy (CFSP) — Restrictive measures against the Islamic Republic of Iran — Damage allegedly suffered by the appellant as a result of its name being included and maintained on the list of persons and entities subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources — Action for damages — Jurisdiction of the Court to rule on a claim seeking compensation for the damage allegedly caused by restrictive measures taken in decisions adopted pursuant to the CFSP — Sufficiently serious breach of a rule of law intended to confer rights on individuals)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62019CA0680
62019CA0680
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
17.1.2022
Official Journal of the European Union
C 24/2
(Case C-680/19 P) (*)
(Appeal - Common foreign and security policy (CFSP) - Restrictive measures against the Islamic Republic of Iran - Damage allegedly suffered by the appellant as a result of its name being included and maintained on the list of persons and entities subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources - Action for damages - Jurisdiction of the Court to rule on a claim seeking compensation for the damage allegedly caused by restrictive measures taken in decisions adopted pursuant to the CFSP - Sufficiently serious breach of a rule of law intended to confer rights on individuals)
(2022/C 24/02)
Language of the case: French
Parties
Appellant: Fulmen (represented by: A. Bahrami, avocat, and N. Korogiannakis, dikigoros)
Other parties to the proceedings: Council of the European Union (represented by: M.-C. Cadilhac and M. Bishop, acting as Agents), European Commission (represented by: A. Boquet and J. Roberti di Sarsina, acting as Agents)
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1.Dismisses the appeal;
2.Orders Fulmen to bear its own costs and to pay the costs incurred by the Council of the European Union;
3.Orders the European Commission to bear its own costs.
(*)
Language of the case: French.
(1) OJ C 372, 4.11.2019.