EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case F-29/11: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 5 December 2012 — BA v Commission (Civil service — Open competition — Competition notice EPSO/AD/147/09 — Creation of a reserve list for the recruitment of administrators having Romanian citizenship — In-depth knowledge of the official language of Romania — Hungarian language minority in Romania — Not admitted to the oral test — Principles of equal treatment and non-discrimination — Scope)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62011FA0029

62011FA0029

December 5, 2012
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

16.2.2013

Official Journal of the European Union

C 46/28

(Case F-29/11)(1)

(Civil service - Open competition - Competition notice EPSO/AD/147/09 - Creation of a reserve list for the recruitment of administrators having Romanian citizenship - In-depth knowledge of the official language of Romania - Hungarian language minority in Romania - Not admitted to the oral test - Principles of equal treatment and non-discrimination - Scope)

2013/C 46/53

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: BA (Wezembeek-Oppem, Belgium) (represented: initially by S. Orlandi, A. Coolen, J.-N. Louis and É. Marchal, lawyers and subsequently by S. Orlandi, A. Coolen, J.-N. Louis, É. Marchal and D. Abreu Caldas, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented: initially by B. Eggers and P. Pecho, acting as Agents, and subsequently by B. Eggers, acting as Agent)

Re:

Civil service — Action for annulment of the selection board’s decision in competition EPSO/AD/147/09-RO not to admit the applicant to the oral test in that competition.

Operative part of the judgment

The Tribunal:

1.Dismisses the action;

2.Orders BA to bear her own costs and to pay the costs incurred by the European Commission.

(1) OJ C 173, 11.6.2011, p. 16.

* * *

Language of the case: French

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia