I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the Community word mark RNAiFect - Earlier Community word mark RNActive - Relative ground for refusal - No likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))
2009/C 297/28
Language of the case: German
Applicant: CureVac GmbH (Tübingen, Germany) (represented by: F. Graf von Stosch, lawyer)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: M. Kicia and S. Schäffner, Agents)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the Court of First Instance: Qiagen GmbH (Hilden, Germany) (represented by: initially E. Krings, and subsequently V. von Bomhard, A. Renck and T. Dolde, lawyers)
Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 11 December 2007 (Case R 1219/2006-1) relating to opposition proceedings between CureVac GmbH and Qiagen GmbH.
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders CureVac GmbH to pay the costs.
(<span class="super">1</span>) OJ C 107, 26.4.2008.