- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case F-23/15: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 18 March 2016 — Kerstens v Commission (Civil Service — Officials — Obligations — Acts contrary to the dignity of the civil service — Dissemination of insulting remarks with regard to another official — Article 12 of the Staff Regulations — Disciplinary procedure — Enquiry in the form of an examination of the facts — Reprimand — Article 9(1)(b) of Annex IX to the Staff Regulations — Consequences of the irregularity)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62015FA0023
62015FA0023
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C 156/55
(Case F-23/15) (<span class="super">1</span>)
((Civil Service - Officials - Obligations - Acts contrary to the dignity of the civil service - Dissemination of insulting remarks with regard to another official - Article 12 of the Staff Regulations - Disciplinary procedure - Enquiry in the form of an examination of the facts - Reprimand - Article 9(1)(b) of Annex IX to the Staff Regulations - Consequences of the irregularity))
(2016/C 156/77)
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicant: Petrus Kerstens (Overijse, Belgium) (represented by: C. Mourato, lawyer)
Defendant: European Commission (represented by: T.S. Bohr and C. Ehrbar, acting as Agents)
Re:
Application for annulment of the decision to impose a disciplinary penalty in the form of a reprimand on the applicant.
Operative part of the judgment
The Tribunal:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders Mr Petrus Kerstens to bear his own costs and to pay the costs incurred by the European Commission.
(<span class="super">1</span>) OJ C 127, 20.4.2015, p. 42.