I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case F-37/12) (<span class="super">1</span>)
((Civil Service - EIB staff - Psychological harassment - Investigation procedure - Report of the Investigation Panel - Incorrect definition of psychological harassment - Decision of the President of the EIB to take no action on a complaint - Annulment - Action for compensation))
(2016/C 048/98)
Language of the case: Italian
Applicant: Carlo De Nicola (Strassen, Luxembourg) (represented by: L. Isola, lawyer)
Defendant: European Investment Bank (represented by: G. Nuvoli and T. Gilliams, acting as Agents, and A. Dal Ferro, lawyer)
Application for annulment, on the one hand, of the letter of the President of the EIB by which he rejected, following the opinion of the ‘Dignity at work’ Panel, the applicant’s complaint concerning psychological harassment and, on the other, the findings of the opinion of that Panel in so far as it does not find any facts of psychological harassment.
The Tribunal:
1.Annuls the decision of 20 December 2011 by which the President of the European Investment Bank rejected Mr De Nicola’s complaint of psychological harassment
2.Dismisses the remainder of the action;
3.Orders the European Investment Bank to bear its own costs and to pay the costs incurred by Mr De Nicola.
(<span class="note"> <a id="ntr1-C_2016048EN.01008802-E0001" href="#ntc1-C_2016048EN.01008802-E0001">*1</a> </span>) OJ C 184, 23.6.2012, p. 24.