EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.
Case C-781/21 P: Appeal brought on 16 December 2021 by Daw SE against the judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) delivered on 6 October 2021 in Case T-32/21, Daw SE v European Union Intellectual Property Office
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62021CN0781
62021CN0781
December 16, 2021
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C 222/9
—
(Case C-781/21 P)
(2022/C 222/15)
Language of the case: German
Parties
Appellant: Daw SE (represented by: A. Haberl, Rechtsanwalt)
Other party to the proceedings: European Union Intellectual Property Office
By order of 28 March 2022, the Court of Justice of the European Union (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) decided that the appeal should not be allowed to proceed and ordered the appellant to bear its own costs.
—
EurLex Case Law
AI-Powered Case Law Search
Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions
Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free TrialAt Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.