- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-429/23: Judgment of the General Court of 5 June 2024 – Insights v EUIPO – Geert Hofstede (HOFSTEDE INSIGHTS) (EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU word mark hofstede insights – Earlier national word mark and earlier national trade name HOFSTEDE INSIGHTS – Earlier national trade name and earlier national company name Hofstede Insights – Earlier national trade name and earlier national company name Hofstede Insights Group – Domain name hofstede-insights.com – Domain name hofstede-insights.net – Relative ground for refusal – Article 8(4) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Grounds included for the sake of completeness – Plea in law ineffective)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62023TA0429
62023TA0429
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C series
—
C/2024/4331
15.7.2024
(Case T-429/23)
(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the EU word mark hofstede insights - Earlier national word mark and earlier national trade name HOFSTEDE INSIGHTS - Earlier national trade name and earlier national company name Hofstede Insights - Earlier national trade name and earlier national company name Hofstede Insights Group - Domain name ‘hofstede-insights.com’ - Domain name ‘hofstede-insights.net’ - Relative ground for refusal - Article 8(4) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 - Grounds included for the sake of completeness - Plea in law ineffective)
(C/2024/4331)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: Hofstede Insights Oy (Helsinki, Finland) (represented by: A. Sevillano Orbegozo, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: D. Stoyanova-Valchanova, acting as Agent)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Geert Hofstede BV (Velp, Netherlands) (represented by: L. van der Veer, lawyer)
Re:
By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks annulment of the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 28 April 2023 (Case R 2128/2022-5).
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders Hofstede Insights Oy to bear its own costs and pay those incurred by Geert Hofstede BV;
3.Orders the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) to bear its own costs.
—
Language of the case: English.
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/4331/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—