I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case T-244/21) (<span class="oj-super oj-note-tag">1</span>)
(Environment - Directive 2003/87/EC - System for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading - Transitional free allocation of greenhouse gas emission allowances - Installations producing a product which is not covered by a product benchmark - No direct substitutability between the products - Rejection of data relating to the free allocation of allowances concerning those installations - Obligation to state reasons - Manifest errors of assessment - Equal treatment - Duty of diligence - International obligations and commitments of the European Union - Plea of illegality)
(2023/C 338/22)
Language of the case: English
Applicant: Luossavaara-Kiirunavaara AB (Luleå, Sweden) (represented by: A. Bryngelsson, F. Sjövall and A. Johansson, lawyers)
Defendant: European Commission (represented by: G. Wils and B. De Meester, acting as Agents)
Intervener in support of the applicant: Kingdom of Sweden (represented by: O. Simonsson, C. Meyer-Seitz, A. Runeskjöld, M. Salborn Hodgson, H. Shev, H. Eklinder and R. Shahsavan Eriksson, acting as Agents)
By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of Article 1(3) of Commission Decision (EU) 2021/355 of 25 February 2021 concerning national implementation measures for the transitional free allocation of greenhouse gas emission allowances in accordance with Article 11(3) of Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ 2021 L 68, p. 221).
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders Luossavaara-Kiirunavaara AB to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission;
3.Orders the Kingdom of Sweden to bear its own costs.
(<span class="oj-super">1</span>) OJ C 289, 19.7.2021.