- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-684/21: Judgment of the General Court of 15 February 2023 — Mostostal v EUIPO — Polimex — Mostostal (MOSTOSTAL) (EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — EU word mark MOSTOSTAL — Obligation to state reasons — Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62021TA0684
62021TA0684
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
11.4.2023
Official Journal of the European Union
C 127/34
(Case T-684/21) (*)
(EU trade mark - Invalidity proceedings - EU word mark MOSTOSTAL - Obligation to state reasons - Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001)
(2023/C 127/41)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: Mostostal S.A. (Warsaw, Poland) (represented by: C. Saettel and K. Krawczyk, lawyers)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: J. Crespo Carrillo, acting as Agent)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Polimex — Mostostal S.A. (Warsaw) (represented by: J. Kubalski, K. Szczudlik and M. Hyży, lawyers)
Re:
By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks annulment of the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 30 July 2021 (Case R 2508/2019-5).
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1.Annuls the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 30 July 2021 (Case R 2508/2019-5);
2.Orders EUIPO to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by Mostostal S.A.;
3.Orders Polimex — Mostostal S.A. to bear its own costs.
(*) Language of the case: English.
OJ C 2, 3.1.2022.