I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Appeal - Civil service - Contractual agents - Expatriation allowance - Conditions imposed by Article 4 of Annex VII to the Staff Regulations - Notion of habitual residence - Distortion of the facts - Appeal clearly inadmissible in part and clearly unfounded in part)
(2012/C 39/28)
Language of the case: French
Appellant(s): VE (*) (represented by L. Vogel, lawyer)
Other party/parties to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by D. Martin and B. Eggers, Agents)
Appeal against the judgment of the European Union Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 15 March 2011 in Case F-28/10 VE (*) v Commission [2011] ECR-SC I-A-I-0000 and II-A-1-0000, seeking to have that judgment set aside.
1.The appeal is dismissed.
2. VE (*) will bear his own costs and will pay those incurred by the European Commission on the appeal.
Information erased or replaced within the framework of protection of personal data and/or confidentiality.
OJ C 232, 6.8.2011.