EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case T-138/12: Action brought on 26 March 2012 — Geipel v OHIM — Reeh (BEST BODY NUTRITION)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62012TN0138

62012TN0138

March 26, 2012
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 157/10

(Case T-138/12)

2012/C 157/18

Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties

Applicant: Yves Geipel (Auerbach, Germany) (represented by: J. Sachs, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Jörg Reeh (Buxtehude, Germany)

Form of order sought

Annul the contested decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 12 January 2012 and reject the opposition of 24 July 2009;

Order OHIM to pay the costs of the proceedings, including the costs incurred in the appeal proceedings.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for a Community trade mark: Yves Geipel

Community trade mark concerned: Figurative mark ‘BEST BODY NUTRITION’ (international registration No W 982 101, naming the European Union) for goods in classes 25, 28, 29, 30 and 32.

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: Jörg Reeh.

Mark or sign cited in opposition: Community trade mark No 4 020 161‘BEST4BODY’ for goods in class 25.

Decision of the Opposition Division: Opposition allowed.

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Appeal dismissed.

Pleas in law: There is no likelihood of confusion between the marks at issue.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia