- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-597/20: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 29 September 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Fővárosi Törvényszék — Hungary) — Polskie Linie Lotnicze ‘LOT’ S.A. v Budapest Főváros Kormányhivatala (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Air transport — Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 — Article 16 — Compensation and assistance to passengers — Task of the national body responsible for the enforcement of that regulation — National legislation conferring on that body the power to order an air carrier to pay compensation due to a passenger — Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Article 47 — Right to seek remedy before a tribunal)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62020CA0597
62020CA0597
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
14.11.2022
Official Journal of the European Union
C 432/2
(Case C-597/20) (*)
(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Air transport - Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 - Article 16 - Compensation and assistance to passengers - Task of the national body responsible for the enforcement of that regulation - National legislation conferring on that body the power to order an air carrier to pay compensation due to a passenger - Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union - Article 47 - Right to seek remedy before a tribunal)
(2022/C 432/02)
Language of the case: Hungarian
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant: Polskie Linie Lotnicze ‘LOT’ S.A.
Defendant: Budapest Főváros Kormányhivatala
Operative part of the judgment
Article 16 of Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 February 2004 establishing common rules on compensation and assistance to passengers in the event of denied boarding and of cancellation or long delay of flights, and repealing Regulation (EEC) No 295/91
must be interpreted as meaning that the Member States have the power to authorise the national body responsible for the enforcement of that regulation to compel an air carrier to pay compensation, within the meaning of Article 7 of that regulation, due to passengers under that regulation, where an individual complaint has been made to that national body by a passenger, provided that it is open to that passenger and that air carrier to bring proceedings before the courts.
(*) Language of the case: Hungarian.