- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-539/14: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Audiencia Provincial de Castellón (Spain) lodged on 27 November 2014 — Juan Carlos Sánchez Morcillo, María del Carmen Abril García v Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria, S.A.
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62014CN0539
62014CN0539
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
26.1.2015
Official Journal of the European Union
C 26/21
(Case C-539/14)
(2015/C 026/25)
Language of the case: Spanish
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicants: Juan Carlos Sánchez Morcillo, María del Carmen Abril García
Defendant: Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria, S.A.
Question referred
Must Article 7(1) of Directive 93/13/EEC, in conjunction with Articles 47, 34(3) and 7 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, be interpreted as precluding a procedural provision of the kind laid down in Article 695(4) of the Spanish Law on Civil Procedure, applicable to appeals against a decision determining the outcome of an objection to enforcement proceedings in relation to mortgaged or pledged goods, which allows an appeal to be brought only against an order staying the proceedings, disapplying an unfair term or dismissing an opposition based on an unfair term, the immediate consequence of which is that more legal remedies on appeal are available to the seller or supplier seeking enforcement than to the consumer against whom enforcement is sought?
Council Directive 93/13/EEC of 5 April 1993 on unfair terms in consumer contracts
OJ 1993 L 95, p. 29.
OJ 2000, C 364, p. 1.
Language of the case: Spanish
* * *