Official Journal of the European Union

C 65/6

—

(Case C-646/11 P)

2012/C 65/11

Language of the case: English

Parties

Appellant: 3F, formerly Specialarbejderforbundet i Danmark (SID) (represented by: P. Torbøl, advokat, V. Edwards)

Other parties to the proceedings: European Commission, Kingdom of Denmark

Form of order sought

The appellant claims that the Court should:

—Set aside the Judgment of the General Court in its entirety,

—Give final judgment on the matter,

—Order the Commission to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The appellant submits that the contested judgment should be set aside on the following grounds:

—The General Court erred in law in its interpretation and application of the case-law related to the assessment of the length of a preliminary examination under Article 108(3) TFEU.

—The General Court erred in law in its interpretation and application of the case-law on the meaning of ‘serious difficulties’ and the determination of whether such difficulties exist.

—The General Court erred in law by failing to respond to the Appellant's plea relating to infringement of the principle of good administration; in the alternative the General Court erred in law by incorrectly interpreting and applying the case-law on the principle of good administration.

—