I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case C-296/11) (<span class="super">1</span>)
(Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Taxation - VAT - Directive 2006/112/EC - Articles 306 to 310 - Special scheme for travel agents - Discrepancies between language versions - National legislation providing for the application of the special regime to persons other than travellers - Concepts of ‘traveller’ and ‘client’)
2013/C 344/10
Language of the case: French
Applicant: European Commission (represented by: L. Lozano Palacios and C. Soulay, Agents)
Defendant: French Republic (represented by: G. de Bergues and J. — S. Pilczer, Agents)
Interveners in support of the defendant: The Czech Republic (represented by: M. Smolek and T. Müller and by J. Očková, Agents), the Hellenic Republic (represented by: E.-M. Mamouna, Agent), the Kingdom of Spain (represented by: S. Centeno Huerta, Agent), the Republic of Poland (represented by: M. Szpunar and B. Majczyna, Agents), the Portuguese Republic (represented by: L. Inez Fernandes and R. Laires, Agents), the Republic of Finland (represented by: J. Heliskoski, Agent)
Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Infringement of Articles 306 to 310 of Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax (OJ 2006 L 347, p. 1) — National legislation under which the special regime for taxation of travel agents applies to transactions carried out by travel agents for recipients other than travellers
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders the European Commission to pay the costs incurred by the French Republic;
3.Orders the Czech Republic, the Hellenic Republic, the Kingdom of Spain, the Republic of Poland, the Portuguese Republic and the Republic of Finland to bear their own costs.
(<span class="super">1</span>) OJ C 252, 27.8.2011.