I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case T-866/19) (*)
(Action for annulment - Air transport - Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 - Rules on the distribution of air traffic between Schiphol and Lelystad Airports - Priority for the allocation of slots to Lelystad Airport - Regulatory act entailing implementing measures - Not individually concerned - Inadmissibility)
(2021/C 382/35)
Language of the case: English
Applicants: Ryanair DAC (Swords, Ireland), Laudamotion GmbH (Schwechat, Austria) (represented by: E. Vahida and I.G. Metaxas-Maranghidis, lawyers)
Defendant: European Commission (represented by: V. Di Bucci and W. Mölls, acting as Agents)
Application under Article 263 TFEU seeking the annulment of Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2019/1585 of 24 September 2019 on the establishment of traffic distribution rules pursuant to Article 19 of Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council for the airports Amsterdam Schiphol and Amsterdam Lelystad (OJ 2019 L 246, p. 24).
1.The action is dismissed.
2.There is no need to rule on the application for leave to intervene submitted by the Kingdom of the Netherlands.
3.Ryanair DAC and Laudamotion GmbH shall bear their own costs and pay the costs incurred by the European Commission.
4.The Kingdom of the Netherlands shall bear its own costs relating to the application for leave to intervene.
(*) Language of the case: English.
(1) OJ C 68, 2.3.2020.
ECLI:EU:C:2021:140