I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
C series
—
(Action for annulment - Decision 2006/928/EC - Mechanism for cooperation and verification of progress in Romania to address specific benchmarks in the areas of judicial reform and the fight against corruption - Decision (EU) 2023/1786 repealing Decision 2006/928 - No direct concern - Inadmissibility)
(C/2025/2397)
Language of the case: English
Applicant: Asociația Inițiativa pentru Justiție (Constanța, Romania) (represented by: V.-D. Oanea, lawyer, and C. Zatschler, Senior Counsel)
Defendant: European Commission (represented by: K. Herrmann, T. Maxian Rusche, P. Van Nuffel and I. Rogalski, acting as Agents)
By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of Commission Decision (EU) 2023/1786 of 15 September 2023 repealing Decision 2006/928/EC establishing a mechanism for cooperation and verification of progress in Romania to address specific benchmarks in the areas of judicial reform and the fight against corruption (OJ 2023 L 229, p. 94).
The action is dismissed as inadmissible.
There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the application to intervene lodged by Romania.
Asociația Inițiativa pentru Justiție shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by the European Commission.
Romania shall bear its own costs relating to the application to intervene.
—
(1)
OJ C C/2024/772, 22.1.2024.
—
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/2397/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—