- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-26/17: Judgment of the General Court of 17 October 2018 — Jahlk v Parliament (Privileges and immunities — Member of the European Parliament — Decision to waive parliamentary immunity — Connection with the duties of a Member of the European Parliament — Equal treatment — Legal certainty — Legitimate expectations — Procedure for waiving immunity — Rights of defence — Misuse of powers — Non-contractual liability)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62017TA0026
62017TA0026
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
3.12.2018
Official Journal of the European Union
C 436/40
(Case T-26/17) (<span class="super note-tag">1</span>)
((Privileges and immunities - Member of the European Parliament - Decision to waive parliamentary immunity - Connection with the duties of a Member of the European Parliament - Equal treatment - Legal certainty - Legitimate expectations - Procedure for waiving immunity - Rights of defence - Misuse of powers - Non-contractual liability))
(2018/C 436/56)
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicant: Jean-François Jalkh (Gretz-Armainvilliers, France) (represented initially by J.-P. Le Moigne, subsequently by M. Ceccaldi, and finally by F. Wagner, lawyers)
Defendant: European Parliament (represented initially by M. Dean and S. Alonso de León, and subsequently by S. Alonso de León, N. Görlitz and S. Seyr, acting as Agents)
Re:
First, application based on Article 263 TFEU seeking annulment of Decision P8_TA(2016)0430 of the Parliament of 22 November 2016 waiving the applicant’s parliamentary immunity and, second, application based on Article 268 TFEU seeking compensation in respect of the harm allegedly suffered by the applicant.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders Mr Jean-François Jalkh to bear his own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Parliament, including those relating to the application for interim measures.
(<span class="note"> <a id="ntr1-C_2018436EN.01004002-E0001" href="#ntc1-C_2018436EN.01004002-E0001">*1</a> </span>) OJ C 70, 6.3.2017.