- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-499/19: Action brought on 10 July 2019 – ZU v EEAS
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62019TN0499
62019TN0499
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
14.10.2019
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 348/16
—
(Case T-499/19)
(2019/C 348/16)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: ZU (represented by: C. Bernard-Glanz, lawyer)
Defendant: European External Action Service (EEAS)
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the decisions of the EEAS of 31 August 2018 and 10 January 2019, implementing the note of the Medical Service of 30 August 2018, by deducting sick leave;
—order the defendant to pay the costs.
Pleas in law and main arguments
In support of the action, the applicant relies on three pleas in law.
1.First plea in law, alleging breach of the principle of good administration and duty of care, inflating cost estimates leading to unjustified attribution to the applicant of responsibility for not appearing for a medical check in Brussels.
2.Second plea in law, alleging misuse of powers with an indication of deliberate intent to undermine the applicant due to personal bias.
3.Third plea in law, alleging manifest error of assessment with regard to the question whether the applicant’s legal situation had changed and a failure to analyse thoroughly why responsibility was attributed to the applicant for not appearing for a medical check.
—