- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case F-84/15: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (3rd Chamber) of 2 March 2016 — Loescher v Council (Civil service — Officials — Union representative — Put at the disposal of a trade union or staff association — 2014 promotion procedure — Decision not to promote the applicant — Article 45 of the Staff Regulations — Comparative merits — No obligation under the Staff Regulations to provide for a specific method for assessing the comparative merits of staff put at the disposal of trade union or professional associations — Taking into account of staff reports — Assessment of the level of responsibilities held — Evidence — Review of a manifest error of assessment)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62015FA0084
62015FA0084
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
18.4.2016
Official Journal of the European Union
C 136/49
(Case F-84/15) (<span class="super">1</span>)
((Civil service - Officials - Union representative - Put at the disposal of a trade union or staff association - 2014 promotion procedure - Decision not to promote the applicant - Article 45 of the Staff Regulations - Comparative merits - No obligation under the Staff Regulations to provide for a specific method for assessing the comparative merits of staff put at the disposal of trade union or professional associations - Taking into account of staff reports - Assessment of the level of responsibilities held - Evidence - Review of a manifest error of assessment))
(2016/C 136/69)
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicant: Bernd Loescher (Rhode-Saint-Genèse, Belgium) (represented by: J.-N. Louis and N. de Montigny, lawyers)
Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: M. Bauer and M. Veiga, Agents)
Re:
Application for annulment of the decision not to promote the applicant to the next grade (AD 12) in the 2014 Council of the European Union promotion procedure.
Operative part of the judgment
The Tribunal:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Declares that Mr Loescher is to bear his own costs and orders him to pay the costs incurred by the Council of the European Union.
(<span class="super">1</span>) OJ C 279, 24/8/2015, p. 60.
* * *
Language of the case: French