EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case C-703/22, CBR (Hemianopsia): Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 21 March 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Raad van State - Netherlands) – WU v Directie van het Centraal Bureau Rijvaardigheidsbewijzen (CBR) (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Transport – Road transport – Directive 2006/126/EC – Driving licences – Conditions for issue or renewal – Minimum standards for physical and mental fitness – Eyesight – Point 6.4 of Annex III – Principle of proportionality – Person not meeting the field of vision requirement – Favourable opinion on fitness to drive issued by medical experts – Discretion in an individual case failing an express exception)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62022CA0703

62022CA0703

March 21, 2024
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

Official Journal of the European Union

C series

C/2024/3133

(Case C-703/22,

CBR (Hemianopsia))

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Transport - Road transport - Directive 2006/126/EC - Driving licences - Conditions for issue or renewal - Minimum standards for physical and mental fitness - Eyesight - Point 6.4 of Annex III - Principle of proportionality - Person not meeting the field of vision requirement - Favourable opinion on fitness to drive issued by medical experts - Discretion in an individual case failing an express exception)

(C/2024/3133)

Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: WU

Defendant: Directie van het Centraal Bureau Rijvaardigheidsbewijzen (CBR)

Operative part of the judgment

must be interpreted as precluding, in a specific case, a person who does not, from a medical point of view, meet the requirement provided for in that point that drivers in Group 2 – that is, drivers of vehicles in categories C, CE, C1, C1E, D, DE, D1 and D1E – must not have a horizontal field of vision in both eyes of less than 160 degrees, from being considered to meet that standard, in so far as, according to several medical experts, that person is actually able to drive a motor vehicle in one of those categories.

ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/3133/oj

ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia