- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-408/07: Order of the General Court of 4 February 2010 — Crunch Fitness International v OHIM — ILG (CRUNCH) (Community trade mark — Revocation — Withdrawal of the request for revocation — No need to adjudicate)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62007TB0408
62007TB0408
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
17.4.2010
Official Journal of the European Union
C 100/39
(Case T-408/07) (<span class="super">1</span>)
(Community trade mark - Revocation - Withdrawal of the request for revocation - No need to adjudicate)
2010/C 100/61
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: Crunch Fitness International, Inc. (New York, New York, United States) (represented by: initially J. Barry, Solicitor, and subsequently H. Johnson, Barrister)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: S. Laitinen and D. Botis, Agents)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM intervening before the General Court: ILG Ltd (Dun Laoghaire, Ireland) (represented by: A. von Mühlendahl, lawyer)
Re:
Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 30 August 2007 (Case R 1168/2005-4) relating to revocation proceedings between ILG Ltd and Crunch Fitness International Inc.
Operative part of the order
1.There is no need to rule on the action.
2.The applicant and the intervener shall bear their own costs and shall each pay half of those incurred by the defendant.
(<span class="super">1</span>) OJ C 8, of 12.1.2008.