- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-536/23, Mutua Madrileña Automovilista: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht München I (Germany) lodged on 22 August 2023 — Bundesrepublik Deutschland v Mutua Madrileña Automovilista
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62023CN0536
62023CN0536
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
Series C
C/2023/1128
4.12.2023
(Case C-536/23, Mutua Madrileña Automovilista)
(C/2023/1128)
Language of the case: German
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant and appellant: Bundesrepublik Deutschland
Defendant and respondent: Mutua Madrileña Automovilista
Question referred
Must Article 13(2) of Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2012 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters, read in conjunction with Article 11(1)(b) of that regulation, be interpreted as meaning that a Member State of the European Union itself, in its capacity as an employer which has continued to pay the remuneration of its official who has (temporarily) become unfit for work as a result of a road traffic accident and which is subrogated to the official’s rights vis-à-vis the company, established in another Member State, that provides the civil liability insurance for the vehicle involved in that accident, may sue the insurance company as an ‘injured party’ within the meaning of that provision before the courts for the place where the official who is unfit for work is domiciled, where a direct action is permitted?
(1) OJ 2012 L 351, p. 1.
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2023/1128/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)