- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case F-32/10: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 13 April 2011 — Wilk v Commission (Civil Service — Members of the temporary staff — Reimbursement of expenses — Installation allowance — Installation with family at the place of employment — Recovery of undue payments — Action manifestly inadmissible or manifestly lacking any foundation in law)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62010FB0032
62010FB0032
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
12.5.2012
Official Journal of the European Union
C 138/28
(Case F-32/10) (*)
(Civil Service - Members of the temporary staff - Reimbursement of expenses - Installation allowance - Installation with family at the place of employment - Recovery of undue payments - Action manifestly inadmissible or manifestly lacking any foundation in law)
(2012/C 138/60)
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicant: Christian Wilk (Trier, Germany) (represented by: R. Adam, lawyer)
Defendant: European Commission (represented by: J. Currall and D. Martin, Agents)
Re:
Application for annulment of decisions ordering recovery of one half of the installation allowance paid to the applicant following his divorce, and an application for damages
Operative part of the order
1.Mr Wilk’s action is dismissed as being in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly lacking any foundation in law.
2.Mr Wilk is to bear all the costs.
(*)
Language of the case: French
OJ C 179, 3.7.2010, p. 60.