I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case C-67/09 P) (<span class="super">1</span>)
(Appeal - State aid - Aid scheme for investment in the less-favoured regions of Italy - Commission decision declaring that scheme compatible with the common market - Actions for damages in respect of the losses allegedly suffered as a result of the adoption of that decision - Transitional measures between that scheme and the previous scheme - Temporal scope of application of the Commission’s decision not to object to the previous scheme - Principles of legal certainty, protection of legitimate expectations and equal treatment)
2010/C 346/17
Language of the case: Italian
Appellant: Nuova Agricast Srl, Cofra Srl (represented by: A. Calabrese, avvocato)
Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: V. Di Bucci and E. Righini, Agents)
Appeal against the judgment delivered by the Court of First Instance (First Chamber) on 2 December 2008 in Cases T-362/05 and T-363/05 Nuova Agricast v Commission by which the Court of First Instance rejected the claims for damages for the loss allegedly suffered by the appellants as a result of the adoption by the Commission of the Decision of 12 July 2000 declaring compatible with the common market an aid scheme for investment in the less-favoured regions of Italy (State aid No 715/1999 — Italy (SG 2000 D/105754)) and as a result of the Commission’s conduct during the procedure which preceded the adoption of that decision.
The Court:
1.Dismisses the appeal;
2.Orders Nuova Agricast Srl and Cofra Srl to pay the costs.
(<span class="super">1</span>) OJ C 90, 18.4.2009.