- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-290/12: Action brought on 29 June 2012 — Poland v Commission
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62012TN0290
62012TN0290
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
18.8.2012
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 250/18
(Case T-290/12)
2012/C 250/34
Language of the case: Polish
Parties
Applicant: Republic of Poland (represented by: B. Majczyna and M. Szpunar, Agents)
Defendant: European Commission
Form of order sought
—Annul Article 1(2), (3), (4), (6), (12) and (13), Annexes I and II, and Article 2(1) to (3), in conjunction with Article 3, of Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 302/2012 of 4 April 2012 amending Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 laying down detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 in respect of the fruit and vegetables and processed fruit and vegetables sectors (OJ L 99 of 5.4.2012, p. 21);
—Order the European Commission to pay the costs of the proceedings.
Pleas in law and main arguments
In support of its action, the applicant relies on four pleas in law.
1.First plea in law:
—infringement of the principles of legal certainty and of the protection of legitimate expectations;
2.Second plea in law:
—infringement of the principle of proportionality;
3.Third plea in law:
—breach of Article 296 TFEU by virtue of the inadequate reasons given for the contested provisions;
4.Fourth plea in law:
—infringement of the principles of solidarity and of loyal cooperation.