- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-306/18: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Krajský soud v Ostravě — pobočka v Olomouci (Czech Republic) lodged on 7 May 2018 — KORADO, a.s. v Generální ředitelství cel
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62018CN0306
62018CN0306
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case C-306/18)
Language of the case: Czech
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant: KORADO, a.s.
Defendant: Generální ředitelství cel
Questions referred
1.Is Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/23 (1) of 5 January 2015, in which the goods described in column 1 of the table in the annex are classified under sub-heading 7 307 93 19 of the Combined Nomenclature, valid?
2.If that Regulation is invalid, could the articles concerned be classified under sub-heading 7 322 19 00 of the Combined Nomenclature?
3.If that Regulation is valid, must the articles concerned be classified under sub-heading 7 307 93 19 of the Combined Nomenclature?
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/23 of 5 January 2015 concerning the classification of certain goods in the Combined Nomenclature, OJ 2015 L 4, p. 15.