I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
C series
—
(Action for annulment - Economic and monetary policy - Single resolution mechanism for credit institutions and certain investment firms - Resolution scheme in respect of Banco Popular Español - Act not open to challenge - Manifest inadmissibility)
(C/2025/2073)
Language of the case: Spanish
Applicants: Ángel Folch Torrela (Terrassa, Spain) and the 42 other applicants whose names are listed in the annex to the order (represented by: V. Clavell Hernández, C. de Santiago Álvarez and J. Redondo Martín, lawyers)
Defendant: Single Resolution Board (represented by: H. Ehlers, M. Fernández Rupérez, A. Lapresta Bienz and J. Rius Riu, acting as Agents, and by B. Meyring, F. Fernández de Trocóniz Robles, T. Klupsch and S. Ianc, lawyers)
By their action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicants seek the annulment of Decision SRB/EES/2017/08 of the Executive Session of the Single Resolution Board (SRB) of 7 June 2017 concerning the adoption of a resolution scheme in respect of Banco Popular Español, SA.
The action is dismissed as manifestly inadmissible.
There is no need to adjudicate on the applications for leave to intervene by the Kingdom of Spain, the European Commission, Banco Santander, SA and Banco Popular Español, SA.
Mr Ángel Folch Torrela and the other applicants whose names are listed in the annex shall bear their own costs and pay those incurred by the Single Resolution Board (SRB).
The Kingdom of Spain and the Commission shall each bear their own costs relating to the applications for leave to intervene.
Banco Santander shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by Banco Popular Español relating to the applications for leave to intervene.
—
(1)
OJ C 357, 23.10.2017.
—
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/2073/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—