I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
EN
(Case T-132/22)
(2022/C 191/43)
Language in which the application was lodged: English
Applicant: Société des produits Nestlé SA (Vevey, Switzerland) (represented by: A. Jaeger-Lenz, M. Goldmann and C. Elkemann, lawyers)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Impossible Foods Inc. (Redwood City, California, United States)
Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal
Trade mark at issue: European Union word mark IMPOSSIBLE SAUSAGE — European Union trade mark No 18 061 982
Procedure before EUIPO: Cancellation proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 22 December 2021 in Case R 972/2021-5
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision;
—order EUIPO to pay the costs of the proceedings before the General Court and order the intervener to pay the costs before the EUIPO.
—Infringement of Article 94(1), second sentence, read in conjunction with Article 70(2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;
—Infringement of Article 95(1), first sentence, read in conjunction with third sentence of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;
—Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;
—Infringement of Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.