- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Order of the Court of First Instance (Fifth Chamber) of 5 March 2004. # Xanthippi Liakoura v Council of the European Union. # Officials - Staff Report - Action manifestly inadmissible or manifestly lacking foundation in law. # Case T-281/03.
ECLI:EU:T:2004:69
62003TO0281
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Officials – Staff Report – Action manifestly inadmissible or manifestly lacking foundation in law)
Full text in French II - 0000
Application: for annulment of certain assessments given in the applicant’s staff report for the period 1999-2001.
Held: The application is dismissed as manifestly inadmissible in part, and as manifestly lacking foundation in law for the remainder. The parties are ordered to bear their own costs.
Summary
(Staff Regulations, Art. 91)
(Staff Regulations, Art. 91)
(Staff Regulations, Art. 43)
(Staff Regulations, Art. 43)
(see para. 22)
See: 192/88 Turner v Commission [1989] ECR 1017; T-19/97 Richter v Commission [1997] ECR-SC I-A-379 and II-1019, para. 60
(see paras 36-38)
(see paras 40-41)
See: 36/81, 37/81 and 218/81 Seton v Commission [1983] ECR 1789, para. 23; T-212/97 Hubert v Commission [1999] ECR-SC I-A-41 and II-185, para. 142
(see para. 42)
See: 190/82 Blomefield v Commission [1983] ECR 3981, para. 20; T-63/89 Latham v Commission [1991] ECR II-19, para. 5; T-23/91 Maurissen v Court of Auditors [1992] ECR II-2377, para. 41 et seq.