EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case C-233/21 P: Appeal brought on 9 April 2021 by Germann Avocats LLC against the order of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) delivered on 4 February 2021 in Case T-352/18, Germann Avocats LLC v European Commission

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62021CN0233

62021CN0233

April 9, 2021
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

Official Journal of the European Union

C 320/15

(Case C-233/21 P)

(2021/C 320/19)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Appellant: Germann Avocats LLC (represented by: N. Scandamis, dikigoros)

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

confirm points 24 to 48 of the contested order fully rejecting the Commission's objection of inadmissibility;

for the rest, fully set aside the contested order;

annul pursuant to Article 263 TFEU the Commission’s decision contained in an undated letter received on 2 April 2018 rejecting the joint tender submitted by the Appellant for a follow-up study on trade union practices on non-discrimination and diversity in the workplace (call for tenders JUST/2017/RDIS/FW/EQUA/0042; OJ/S S215 — 09/11/2017 — 2017/S 215-446067);

order the Commission to pay damages in the amount of EUR 1;

alternatively, refer the case back to the General Court; and in any event

order the Commission to pay the costs of the appeal proceedings and the proceedings before the General Court.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The appellant advances the following pleas in support of its appeal:

First, manifest distortion of facts and errors of law in relation to the misuse of powers, as well as violation of the principles of equality of arms and the right to be heard.

Second, infringement of the duty to state reasons and manifest errors of assessment.

Third, misuse of powers by infringement of the principles of equal treatment, legal certainty, sound administration and good faith.

Fourth, misuse of powers by infringement of the principle of transparency and protection of legitimate expectations regarding competition.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia