I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case T-524/16) (*)
(Civil service - Officials - 2014 Reform of the Staff Regulations - Travelling time - Home leave - Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)
(2022/C 73/53)
Language of the case: French
Applicant: Antonio Aresu (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: M. Velardo, lawyer)
Defendant: European Commission (represented by: G. Gattinara and F. Blanc, acting as Agents)
Interveners in support of the defendant: European Parliament (represented by: E. Tavena and M. Ecker, acting as Agents), Council of the European Union (represented by: M. Bauer and R. Meyer, acting as Agents)
Application pursuant to Article 270 TFEU seeking annulment of the decision no longer to grant the applicant, as of 1 January 2014, travelling time of five days which he enjoyed previously on the basis of Article 7 of Annex V to the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union, as amended by Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 1023/2013 of the European Parliament and the Council of 22 October 2013 (OJ 2013 L 287, p. 15).
1.The action is dismissed.
2.Mr Antonio Aresu shall bear his own costs and pay those incurred by the European Commission, including those of the interlocutory proceedings.
3.The European Parliament and the Council of the European Union shall bear their own costs.
(*) Language of the case: French.
(1) OJ C 26, 26.1.2015 (case initially registered before the European Union Civil Service Tribunal under number F-106/14 and transferred to the General Court of the European Union on 1.9.2016).