I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
EN
2013/C 55/43
Language in which the application was lodged: German
Applicant: Tegometall International AG (Lengwil, Switzerland) (represented by: H. Timmann and E. Schaper, lawyers)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Irega AG (Zuchwil, Switzerland)
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—alter the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) of 25 October 2012 in Case R 1522/2011-1 and declare Community trade mark No 3 786 134‘MEGO’ invalid; in the alternative, annul that decision and refer the case back to the Board of Appeal for reassessment;
—order the intervener and OHIM to pay the costs of the invalidity proceedings, the appeal proceedings and the present action.
Registered Community trade mark in respect of which a declaration of invalidity has been sought: the word mark ‘MEGO’ for goods in Classes 6 and 20 — Community trade mark No 3 786 134
Proprietor of the Community trade mark: Irega AG
Applicant for the declaration of invalidity of the Community trade mark: the applicant
Grounds for the application for a declaration of invalidity: the national, Community and international registrations of the word mark ‘TEGO’, the national and Community trade marks ‘TEGOMETALL’ and the national, Community and international registrations of the figurative mark, which includes the word element ‘Tegometall’, for goods in Classes 6, 20 and 21
Decision of the Cancellation Division: the application was rejected
Decision of the Board of Appeal: the appeal was dismissed
Pleas in law:
—Incorrect application of the principle of res judicata
—Infringement of Article 34(2) and Article 8(2) of Regulation No 207/2009
—Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009