I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Action for annulment –Telecommunications – Article 7 of Directive 2002/21/EC – Wholesale market for voice call termination on individual mobile networks in Belgium – Significant power on the market – Commission’s comments letter – Non-actionable measure – Lack of direct concern – Inadmissibility
3. Actions for annulment – Natural or legal persons – Measures of direct and individual concern to them – Whether directly concerned – Criteria (Art. 230, fourth para., EC; Directive of the European Parliament and Council 2002/21, Art. 7(3) and (5)) (see paras 119-121)
APPLICATION for annulment of the decision allegedly contained in the letter of the Commission of 4 August 2006, addressed to the Institut belge des services postaux et des telecommunications (Belgian Institute of Post and Telecommunications Services) containing comments, pursuant to Article 7 of Directive 2002/21/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 March 2002 on a common regulatory framework for electronic communications networks and services (Framework Directive) (OJ 2002 L 108, p. 33), concerning a draft decision notified by that institute (Case BE/2006/0433).
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action as inadmissible;
2.Orders Base NV to pay its own costs and the costs of the Commission;
3.Orders Mobistar SA and the Kingdom of the Netherlands to pay their own costs.