EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case T-733/16: Action brought on 18 October 2016 — Banque Postale v ECB

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62016TN0733

62016TN0733

October 18, 2016
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

5.12.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 454/32

(Case T-733/16)

(2016/C 454/55)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: La Banque Postale (Paris, France) (represented by: E. Guillaume and L. Coudray, lawyers)

Defendant: European Central Bank

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the General Court should:

annul the decision of the European Central Bank of 24 August 2016 on the application submitted by La Banque Postale seeking authorisation to exclude exposures to the public sector from the calculation of the leverage ratio in accordance with Article 429(14) of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013;

order the European Central Bank to bear all costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on three pleas in law.

1.First plea in law, alleging that the European Central Bank erred in law by delivering prematurely its decision of 24 August 2016 on the application submitted by La Banque Postale seeking authorisation to exclude exposures to the public sector from the calculation of the leverage ratio (‘the contested decision’).

2.Second plea in law, alleging that the ECB lacks discretion in applying Article 429(14) of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2013 on prudential requirements for credit institutions and investment firms and amending Regulation (EU) No 648/2012 (OJ 2013 L 176, p. 1) (‘Regulation No 575/2013’).

3.Third plea in law, alleging infringements of law by the ECB in adopting the contested decision, relating in particular to:

the lack of a leverage effect in regard to La Banque Postale’s centralised savings;

the alleged risks of non-payment by the Caisse des dépôts et consignations and by the French State;

the alleged operational risks linked to the gathering of La Banque Postale’s centralised savings.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia