I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
EN
2012/C 151/51
Language of the case: French
Applicant: Syriatel Mobile Telecom (Joint Stock Company) (Damas, Syria) (represented by: E. Ruchat, lawyer)
Defendant: Council of the European Union
—Declare the applicant’s action admissible and well founded;
—In consequence, annul Decision 2011/782/CFSP of 1 December 2011 and Regulation (EU) No 36/2012 of 18 January 2012 and their subsequent implementing acts, insofar as they concern the applicant;
—Order the Council of the European Union to pay the costs.
In support of the action, the applicant relies on four pleas in law, the first three of which are in essence identical or similar to those relied on in Cases T-432/11 Makhlouf v Council, and T-433/11 Makhlouf v Council.
The fourth plea alleges infringement of the principle of equal treatment, the consequence of which is to distort competition both within the European Union and Syria and as between those two territories.
(1) OJ 2011 C 290, p. 13.
(2) OJ 2011 C 290, p. 14.
* * *