- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-662/22: Judgment of the General Court of 12 July 2023 — Tavitova v EUIPO– Cordier (AURUS) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU figurative mark AURUS — International registration of the earlier word mark AUDAS — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62022TA0662
62022TA0662
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
18.9.2023
Official Journal of the European Union
C 329/25
(Case T-662/22) (*)
(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for EU figurative mark AURUS - International registration of the earlier word mark AUDAS - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
(2023/C 329/35)
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicant: Zalina Tavitova (Batoulieh, Lebanon) (represented by: V. Kojevnikov, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: V. Ruzek, acting as Agent)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Cordier (Bordeaux, France) (represented by: D. Remy, lawyer)
Re:
By her action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment in part of the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 25 August 2022 (Case R 2139/2021-5).
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders Zalina Tavitova to pay the costs incurred by Cordier.
(*)
Language of the case: French.
* * *