- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-684/13: Judgment of the General Court of 25 September 2015 — Copernicus-Trademarks v OHIM (BLUECO) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community word mark BLUECO — Prior Community word mark BLUECAR — Relative ground for refusal — Distinctive character of the earlier mark — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Application for alteration made by the intervener — Article 65(4) of Regulation No 207/2009)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62013TA0684
62013TA0684
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
23.11.2015
Official Journal of the European Union
C 389/42
(Case T-684/13) (<span class="super">1</span>)
((Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for Community word mark BLUECO - Prior Community word mark BLUECAR - Relative ground for refusal - Distinctive character of the earlier mark - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Application for alteration made by the intervener - Article 65(4) of Regulation No 207/2009))
(2015/C 389/44)
Language of the case: German
Parties
Applicant: Copernicus-Trademarks Ltd (Borehamwood, United Kingdom) (represented by: L. Pechan and S. Körber, lawyers)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: A. Schifko, acting as Agent)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervening before the General Court: Bolloré SA (Érgue-Gaberic, France) (represented initially by: B. Fontaine, and subsequently by: O. Legrand, lawyers)
Re:
Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 8 October 2013 (Case R 2029/2012-1) concerning opposition proceedings between Bolloré SA and Copernicus-Trademarks Ltd.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Rejects the application for alteration made by Bolloré SA;
3.Orders Copernicus-Trademarks Ltd to pay the costs.
(<span class="super">1</span>) OJ C 52, 22.2.2014.