- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Joined Cases C-10/16 to C-12/16: Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 26 October 2016 (requests for a preliminary ruling from the Commissione tributaria provinciale di Genova, Italy) — Ignazio Messina & C. SpA v Ministero delle Infrastrutture e dei Trasporti — Capitaneria di porto di Genova (C-10/16), Agenzia delle Dogane e dei Monopoli — Ufficio di Genova (C-11/16), Autorità portuale di Genova (C-12/16) (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court — Decision to refer — Insufficient information regarding the legal and factual context — Insufficient information regarding the reasons justifying the need for an answer to the questions referred for a preliminary ruling for the purposes of resolving a dispute in the main proceedings — Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court — Manifest inadmissibility)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62016CB0010
62016CB0010
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
27.2.2017
Official Journal of the European Union
C 63/9
(Joined Cases C-10/16 to C-12/16) (<a id="ntc1-C_2017063EN.01000901-E0001" href="#ntr1-C_2017063EN.01000901-E0001"> (<span class="super note-tag">1</span>)</a>)
((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court - Decision to refer - Insufficient information regarding the legal and factual context - Insufficient information regarding the reasons justifying the need for an answer to the questions referred for a preliminary ruling for the purposes of resolving a dispute in the main proceedings - Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court - Manifest inadmissibility))
(2017/C 063/13)
Language of the case: Italian
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant: Ignazio Messina & C. SpA
Defendants: Ministero delle Infrastrutture e dei Trasporti — Capitaneria di porto di Genova (C-10/16), Agenzia delle Dogane e dei Monopoli — Ufficio di Genova (C-11/16), Autorità portuale di Genova (C-12/16)
Operative part of the order
The requests for a preliminary ruling made by the Commissione tributaria provinciale di Genova (Provincial Tax Court, Genoa, Italy), by decisions of 11 December 2015, are manifestly inadmissible.
(<a id="ntr1-C_2017063EN.01000901-E0001" href="#ntc1-C_2017063EN.01000901-E0001">(<span class="super">1</span>)</a> <a href="./../../../../legal-content/EN/AUTO/?uri=OJ:C:2016:111:TOC">OJ C 111, 29.3.2016</a>.)