I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case T-368/21) (<span class="oj-super oj-note-tag">1</span>)
(Action for annulment - Law governing the institutions - Enhanced cooperation on the establishment of the European Public Prosecutor’s Office - Regulation (EU) 2017/1939 - Appointment of the European Delegated Prosecutors of the European Public Prosecutor’s Office - Derived unlawfulness - Candidates nominated by the Italian Republic - Nomination disputed before the national court - Inadmissability)
(2022/C 213/54)
Language of the case: Italian
Applicant: Alessandro Di Taranto (Rome, Italy) (represented by: G. Pellegrino, lawyer)
Defendant: European Public Prosecutor’s Office (EPPO) (represented by: L. De Matteis and T. Gut, acting as Agents)
Application under Article 263 TFEU seeking annulment of Decision No 34/2021 of the College of the European Public Prosecutor’s Office of 3 May 2021 on the appointment of fifteen European Delegated Prosecutors of the European Public Prosecutor’s Office in the Italian Republic.
1.The action is dismissed as inadmissible.
2.Mr Alessandro Di Taranto shall pay the costs.
(<span class="oj-super">1</span>) OJ C 368, 13.9.2021.