EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case T-78/16: Order of the General Court of 16 September 2016 — Sartour v Parliament (Public service contracts — Food concession in a building occupied by the Parliament — Rejection of the tender of a tenderer and award of the contract to another tenderer — Cancellation of the call for tenders — No need to adjudicate)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62016TB0078

62016TB0078

September 16, 2016
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

Official Journal of the European Union

C 410/21

(Case T-78/16)(Public service contracts - Food concession in a building occupied by the Parliament - Rejection of the tender of a tenderer and award of the contract to another tenderer - Cancellation of the call for tenders - No need to adjudicate)

(2016/C 410/29)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Sartour (Beveren, Belgium) (represented by: M. Cherchi, lawyer)

Defendant: European Parliament (represented by: Z Nagy and S. Toliušis, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application based on Article 263 TFEU and asking for annulment, first, of the European Parliament’s decision of 18 December 2015, rejecting the tender submitted by the applicant under tender procedure 06B40/2015/M073 for the Mediterranean food concession in the Altiero Spinelli Building occupied by the Parliament in Brussels, and, second, of the ‘decision’ whereby the Parliament awarded that concession to another tenderer.

Operative part of the order

1.There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.

2.The European Parliament shall pay the costs.

* Language of the case: French.

(1) OJ C 118, 4.4.2016.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia