EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case C-843/24, 24.hu: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Fővárosi Törvényszék (Hungary) lodged on 9 December 2024 – Viktor Orbán v Editorial board of 24.hu

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62024CN0843

62024CN0843

December 9, 2024
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

Official Journal of the European Union

EN

C series

C/2025/1408

10.3.2025

(C/2025/1408)

Language of the case: Hungarian

Referring court

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Viktor Orbán

Defendant: Editorial board of 24.hu

Questions referred

1.Must Article 3 of Regulation (EU) 2024/1083 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 April 2024 establishing a common framework for media services in the internal market and amending Directive 2010/13/EU (European Media Freedom Act), (*) applicable with effect from 8 November 2024, be applied by the national court after 8 November 2024 in the main proceedings, taking account of the fact that the press release which led to the dispute was published on 17 March 2024?

2.If question 1 is answered in the affirmative, must Article 3 of the European Media Freedom Act, in conjunction with the right to freedom of expression and information guaranteed by Article 11 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, be interpreted as meaning that, where media content published under editorial responsibility in another Member State is referenced, the burden of proof imposed ‘in general’ on the news media outlet in relation to the facts included in the referenced media content does not satisfy the requirements laid down in Article 3?

3.If question 2 is answered in the negative, is national case-law in accordance with which a news media outlet may present content published in another news media outlet of a different Member State only if it is able to substantiate the referenced news content, even though the press release clearly indicates that it is referenced news content, compatible with EU law, in particular Article 11 of the Charter?

* Language of the case: English.

ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/1408/oj

ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia