I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
EN
(Case F-93/11)
2011/C 347/87
Language of the case: French
Applicant: ZZ (represented by: S. Rodrigues and A. Blot, lawyers)
Defendant: European Commission
Annulment of the decision adopted by the chairman of the selection board for Competition EPSO/AST/111/10 — Secretaries (AST 1) not to admit the applicant to the assessment tests
—Annul the decision adopted on 15 June 2011 not to allow the applicant to take part in the assessment tests for Competition EPSO/AST/111/10 — Secretaries, grade AST 1;
—as a result, rule that the applicant must be reinstated within the recruitment process initiated by that competition, if necessary, through the organisation of fresh assessment tests;
—in any event, request EPSO to disclose the information in its possession regarding the results obtained by all the candidates in test (d);
—in the alternative, in the event that the main claim is not upheld, quod non, pay the applicant an amount fixed provisionally and ex aequo et bono at EUR 50 000;
—in any event, pay the applicant, by way of non-material damages, an amount fixed provisionally and ex aequo et bono at EUR 50 000.